Math 390 Lecture 6
In the course of my law-reading I constantly came upon the word demonstrate. I thought, at first, that I understood its meaning, but soon became satisfied that I did not…. I consulted Webster’s Dictionary. That told of “certain proof,” “proof beyond the possibility of doubt;” but I could form no idea what sort of proof that was. I thought a great many things were proved beyond a possibility of doubt, without recourse to any such extraordinary process of reasoning as I understood “demonstration” to be. I consulted all the dictionaries and books of reference I could find, but with no better results. You might as well have defined blue to a blind man. At last I said, “Lincoln, you can never make a lawyer if you do not understand what demonstrate means;” and I left my situation in Springfield, went home to my father’s house, and staid there till I could give any propositions in the six books of Euclid at sight. I then found out what “demonstrate” means, and went back to my law studies.
Postulates
Common Notions
Theorem 1 (Pythagorean Theorem (I-47)) In right-angled triangles the square on the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares on the legs.
Remark. What does it mean for two plane figures to be “equal”? Euclid doesn’t say, but he apparently meant area.
Proposition 1 If there are two straight lines, and one of them is cut into any number of segments whatsoever, the rectangle contained by the two straight lines is equal to the sum of the rectangles contained by the uncut straight line and each of the segments.
Proposition 2 If a straight line is cut at random, the square on the whole is equal to the squares on the segments and twice the rectangle contained by the segments.
Proposition 3 If a straight line is cut into equal and unequal segments, the rectangle contained by the unequal segments of the whole together with the square on the straight line between the points of section is equal to the square on the half.
Recall Aristotle:
If \(a > b\) are two numbers, we can find their greatest common “measure” (divisor):
Definition 1 Four numbers are proportional when the first is the same multiple, or the same part, or the same parts, of the second that the third is of the fourth.
Attempted to extend to magnitude:
Proposition 4 (VII-31) Any composite number is measured by some prime number.
Proposition 5 (VII-31) Any number either is prime or is measured by some prime number.
Prime numbers are more than any assigned multitude of prime numbers.
Proof. Let \(A, B, C\) be primes and \(N = ABC+1\). If \(N\) is prime, then a prime other than those given has been found. If \(N\) is composite, then it is divisible by a prime \(p\). Then \(p\) is distinct from \(A,B,C\) as none of these divides \(N\). Thus a new prime \(p\) has been found.
Circles are to one another as the squares on the diameters.
Idea: “Exhaust” the area of the circle by inscribing it in polygons of increasingly many sides.
Plato made the solids, and five were gifted to the mathematicians. But in secret Plato forged a sixth solid to rule over all the others.